This plan was built on the assumption that funding would close in June 2026. It did not, and funding remains tentative. Rather than publish dates that are already wrong, every milestone below is now expressed as a number of days after the funding event. The sequence, the dependencies, and the targets are unchanged — only the starting gun has moved.
Nearly every milestone in this plan depends on hiring, and hiring depends on funding. A Marketing Manager cannot start in month one if month one has not begun. Restating the schedule against a fixed calendar each time funding slips produces a document that is out of date the week it is written, and it obscures the thing a funder most needs to see: that the work is sequenced, costed, and ready to execute on receipt.
Changed: the calendar. The original plan ran July 2026 through June 2027 on the expectation of a June 2026 close.
Unchanged: the sequence of hires, the ninety-day path to launch, the partner and provider targets at each stage, and the twelve-month ARR range.
Every milestone is written as F + days. F+30 means thirty days after funds land; F+90 means ninety. Phase boundaries are the month equivalents of the original plan, so F+1–30 is what was July 2026, F+31–60 was August, and so on.
| From funding | Original target | Projected | What happens |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase one · building the go-to-market team | |||
| F+1 – 30 | Jul 2026 | — | Team formation beginsMarketing Manager and Sales Lead start. Brand collateral goes into production. |
| F+31 – 60 | Aug 2026 | — | Second wave of hiresBDR, Implementation Associate #1, and Content/Design start. Pilot wraps with documented outcomes done ahead of funding |
| F+61 – 90 | Sep 2026 | — | Pre-launchFive or more institutional partners confirmed. Launch logistics finalized. First case studies published. |
| F+90 | Sep 28 | — | LAUNCH EVENTPress coverage. Digital campaigns go to full budget. |
| Phase two · post-launch execution | |||
| F+150 | Nov 2026 | — | First onboardings completeFirst post-launch institutional onboardings finished. Thirty or more active opportunities in the pipeline. |
| F+180 | Dec 2026 | — | Six-month review15–20 institutional partners live. 80–120 individual providers. |
| F+210 | Jan 2027 | — | Scale the team, work the conferencesSDR and Implementation Associate #2 start. FOCUS SEEK and ACCU conferences. University push for the fall term. |
| Phase three · growth | |||
| F+270 | Mar 2027 | — | Nine-month position30–40 institutional partners. 150–200 individual providers. |
| F+365 | Jun 2027 | — | Twelve-month position40–60 institutional partners. 200–300 individual providers. ARR $350K–$600K. |
The original plan's "year-end review" is shown here as the six-month review, because F+180 is only December if funding closes in June.
Most of this plan moves cleanly with the funding date. Two items are anchored to other people's calendars and cannot be rebased:
Implication worth stating plainly: the cost of delay is not evenly distributed across the year. A close before early autumn preserves the January conference window. A close after it pushes the university channel out by a full academic cycle.
Funding was expected in June 2026 and did not arrive. The months since were not lost time, and two of the milestones above have effectively been retired ahead of schedule:
What this means for F+90. The original ninety-day runway to launch included finishing the pilot and generating the first outcome documentation. That work is done. The ninety days after funding are now almost entirely hiring, collateral, partner confirmation, and event logistics — a lower-risk ninety days than the one originally costed.
So that F+1 is not an abstraction, this is what the first month spends money on and why it must be first:
Divine Mercy University · Presence+ · launch milestones relative to the funding event · prepared August 2026